82 year old Margot Bentley is living in a nursing home in Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada, administered by the Maplewood Seniors Care Society, Fraser Health Authority and the government of British Columbia. She has Alzheimer’s disease and is being spoon-fed because she can still swallow. She is not force-fed if she does not open her mouth. Her family has launched a civil suit to compel the nursing home to stop feeding her, citing her “living will” signed in 1991, about ten years before she was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. The document states that she did not want “nourishment or liquids” if she is suffering from an incurable disease. The defendant nursing home has filed another “living will” that states that she would accept “basic care.” The authenticity of the document is disputed by the family. The nursing home argues that spoon-feeding is basic care, not “medical” care or treatment, and is legally obligatory. The family insists that spoon-feeding must be discontinued, since patients are entitled to refuse medical treatment or care, and Margot Bentley had stated that refusal in her “living will.” [Vancouver Sun]
A bill to legalize abortion is before the Tasmanian Legislative Council. It proposes severe penalties on physicians and counsellors who are unwilling to facilitate the procedure by referral. The Tasmanian chapter of the Australian Medical Association is opposed to the provision, and the state regulator, in supporting it, misrepresented the physicians’ ethical obligations. MLC Paul Harriss, though generally supportive of the bill, has described its treatment of conscientious objection as “heavy handed.” Another MLC, Tony Mulder, also appears to have some concerns regarding conscientious objection. [