Provisions in a bill to legalize abortion that threaten draconian fines to force objecting physicians and counsellors to facilitate the procedure are getting special attention in the Tasmanian Legislative Council. Some members of the Council may be willing to support the bill if the measures aimed at suppressing freedom of conscience are substantially changed. [The Advocate]
- Some Tasmanian legislators concerned about freedom of conscience
- New frontiers in repressing dissent
- AMA Tasmania submission
- Australian regulator misrepresents physician obligations
A bill to legalize abortion is before the Tasmanian Legislative Council. It proposes severe penalties on physicians and counsellors who are unwilling to facilitate the procedure by referral. The Tasmanian chapter of the Australian Medical Association is opposed to the provision, and the state regulator, in supporting it, misrepresented the physicians’ ethical obligations. MLC Paul Harriss, though generally supportive of the bill, has described its treatment of conscientious objection as “heavy handed.” Another MLC, Tony Mulder, also appears to have some concerns regarding conscientious objection. [







