{"id":8031,"date":"2018-02-02T19:01:50","date_gmt":"2018-02-03T03:01:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031"},"modified":"2018-11-07T21:28:18","modified_gmt":"2018-11-08T05:28:18","slug":"canadian-court-tells-doctors-they-must-refer-for-euthanasia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031","title":{"rendered":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia"},"content":{"rendered":"

Will they be hounded out of their profession?<\/h2>\n

Mercatornet<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Michael Cook<\/p>\n

For years bioethicists of a utilitarian cast have argued that conscientious objection has no place in medicine. Now Canadian courts are beginning to put their stamp of approval on the extinction of doctors\u2019 right to refuse to kill their patients.<\/p>\n

The Superior Court of Justice Division Court of Ontario ruled this week that if doctors are unwilling to perform legal actions, they should find another job.<\/p>\n

A group of five doctors and three professional organizations were contesting a policy issued by Ontario\u2019s medical regulator, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), arguing it infringed their right to freedom of religion and conscience under Canada\u2019s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.<\/p>\n

However, Justice Herman J. Wilton-Siegel wrote on behalf of a three-member panel:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cthe applicants do not have a common law right or a property right to practise medicine, much less a constitutionally protected right.<\/p>\n

\u201cThose who enjoy the benefits of a licence to practise a regulated profession must expect to be subject to regulatory requirements that focus on the public interest, rather than the interests of the professionals themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

At issue is the policy of \u201ceffective referral\u201d. A doctor who objects to participating in euthanasia cannot be forced to do it. But he is expected to pass the patient to another doctor who will. The CPSO argues that effective referral is necessary \u201cto protect the public, prevent harm to patients and facilitate access to care for patients in our multicultural, multifaith society, by guiding all physicians on how to uphold their professional and ethical obligations of non-abandonment and of patient-centred care within the context of Ontario\u2019s public health-care system.\u201d<\/p>\n

Without the policy of effective referral, equitable access would be “compromised or sacrificed, in a variety of circumstances, more often than not involving vulnerable members of our society at the time of requesting services,” Justice Herman Wilton-Siegel wrote. People in remote communities might request euthanasia. If their doctor refused, they might suffer needlessly and taxpayers would have to foot the bill to subsidise the refusnik\u2019s conscience.<\/p>\n

It is remarkable how closely Justice Wilton-Siegel\u2019s text hews to the arguments of bioethicists who have been chipping away at the right to conscientious objection for years.<\/p>\n

In 2005 American legal scholar Alta Charo<\/a> described conscientious objection as \u201can unfettered\u00a0 right to personal autonomy while holding monopolistic control over a public good … an abuse of the public trust\u2014all\u00a0 the worse if it is not in fact a personal act of conscience but, rather, an attempt at cultural conquest\u2019.<\/p>\n

In 2006 Oxford\u2019s Julian Savulescu argued in the BMJ<\/a> that \u201cwhen conscientious objection compromises the quality, efficiency, or equitable delivery of a service, it should not be tolerated\u201d.<\/p>\n

More recently, Canadian bioethicist Udo Schuklenk<\/a> and a colleague contended in the BMJ that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cIf at any given time a doctor is unable to continue practicing due to their\u2014ultimately arbitrary\u2014conscience views, nothing would stop them from leaving the profession and taking up a different vocation. This happens across industries and professions very frequently. Professionals can be expected to take responsibility for the voluntary choices they make.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Responding to the ruling, Larry Worthen, executive director of the Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada, said: \u201cWe heard from our members and other doctors with conscientious objections over and over again that they felt referral made them complicit and that they wouldn\u2019t be able to live with themselves or stay in the profession if effective referral is still required.\u201d<\/p>\n

The case is sure to be appealed, but if the doctors championing conscientious objection fail, the consequences will be dire.<\/p>\n

Throughout Canada, doctors would be required to refer for euthanasia. If they refuse, they will be hounded out of their profession, or, at best, shunted into specialties where the question will not arise, like pathology or dermatology.<\/p>\n

This ruling shows how quickly tolerance vanishes after euthanasia has been legalised. In the Carter decision which legalised it, Canada\u2019s Supreme Court explicitly stated that legalizing euthanasia did not entail a duty on the part of physicians to provide it. Now, however, 18 months and more than a thousand death after legalisation, conscientious objection is at risk.<\/p>\n

It also shows how vulnerable religious-based arguments can be. The plaintiffs contended that referring patients violated their right to religious freedom. While this is true, is this the main ground for conscientious objection? As several doctors pointed out in the Canadian Medical Association Journal<\/a> last year, \u201cInsofar as all refusals of therapy are ultimately justified by the ethical belief that the goal of therapy is to provide benefit and avoid harm, all treatment refusals are matters of conscience.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

This article is published by Michael Cook and MercatorNet under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines<\/a>. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation to MercatorNet. Commercial media must contact MercatorNet for permission and fees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Will they be hounded out of their profession? Mercatornet Michael Cook For years bioethicists of a utilitarian cast have argued that conscientious objection has no place in medicine. Now Canadian courts are beginning to put their stamp of approval on the extinction of doctors\u2019 right to refuse to kill their patients. The Superior Court of … Continue reading “Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5432,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,77,32,4,162,7,217,295,19],"tags":[3886,385,208,2303,868,293,1466],"post_folder":[],"class_list":["post-8031","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion","category-assisted-suicide","category-canada","category-commentary","category-euthanasia","category-law","category-lawsuits","category-religious-freedom","category-repression-of-conscience","tag-christian-medical-and-dental-association-canada","tag-college-of-physicians-and-surgeons-of-ontario","tag-julian-savulescu","tag-larry-worthen","tag-r-alta-charo","tag-referral","tag-udo-schuklenk"],"yoast_head":"\r\nCanadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Will they be hounded out of their profession? Mercatornet Michael Cook For years bioethicists of a utilitarian cast have argued that conscientious objection has no place in medicine. Now Canadian courts are beginning to put their stamp of approval on the extinction of doctors\u2019 right to refuse to kill their patients. The Superior Court of … Continue reading "Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia"\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Protection of Conscience Project News\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ConscienceProject\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@consciencepro\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@consciencepro\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031\"},\"wordCount\":846,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Christian Medical and Dental Association (Canada)\",\"College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario\",\"Julian Savulescu\",\"Larry Worthen\",\"R. Alta Charo\",\"referral\",\"Udo Schuklenk\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abortion\",\"Assisted suicide\",\"Canada\",\"Commentary\",\"Euthanasia\",\"Law\",\"Lawsuits\",\"Religious Freedom\",\"Repression of Conscience\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031\",\"name\":\"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?p=8031#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Protection of Conscience Project News\",\"description\":\"Service, not Servitude\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Protection of Conscience Project\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\",\"caption\":\"Protection of Conscience Project\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/news.consciencelaws.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ConscienceProject\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/consciencepro\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/consciencepro\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"\"}]}<\/script>\r\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News","og_description":"Will they be hounded out of their profession? Mercatornet Michael Cook For years bioethicists of a utilitarian cast have argued that conscientious objection has no place in medicine. Now Canadian courts are beginning to put their stamp of approval on the extinction of doctors\u2019 right to refuse to kill their patients. The Superior Court of … Continue reading \"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia\"","og_url":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031","og_site_name":"Protection of Conscience Project News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ConscienceProject","article_published_time":"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@consciencepro","twitter_site":"@consciencepro","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia","datePublished":"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031"},"wordCount":846,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#organization"},"keywords":["Christian Medical and Dental Association (Canada)","College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario","Julian Savulescu","Larry Worthen","R. Alta Charo","referral","Udo Schuklenk"],"articleSection":["Abortion","Assisted suicide","Canada","Commentary","Euthanasia","Law","Lawsuits","Religious Freedom","Repression of Conscience"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031","url":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031","name":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia - Protection of Conscience Project News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-02-03T03:01:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-08T05:28:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?p=8031#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian court tells doctors they must refer for euthanasia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/","name":"Protection of Conscience Project News","description":"Service, not Servitude","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#organization","name":"Protection of Conscience Project","url":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"","contentUrl":"","caption":"Protection of Conscience Project"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ConscienceProject","https:\/\/x.com\/consciencepro","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/consciencepro"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":""}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8031","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5432"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8031"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8031\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8749,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8031\/revisions\/8749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8031"},{"taxonomy":"post_folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.consciencelaws.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fpost_folder&post=8031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}